I don't get it. Why do we keep having the same old debate, nothing gets done, and innocent people keep dying.  On one side are the people who feel that ANY laws restricting the manufacture, sale, or possession of firearms is the beginning of the end of our freedom.  Lose your guns, and the government is going to be knocking down your door and hauling you off to a concentration camp.

On the other side is the group who sees a gun and automatically places the possessor into the same category as Al Capone and Bonnie & Clyde.

WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG???

We own several hunting rifles, shotguns, and a handgun.  We enjoy target shooting and hunting.  Bill keeps them under lock and key.  After all, we have a 4 year old granddaughter who visits quite regularly.  I am not at all opposed to the proper ownership and use of guns.  I do, however, feel that people should have to go through a screening process to weed out the mentally unbalanced and unfit.  I can't understand anyone needing an arsenal of dozens of high powered assault weapons with 30 or 50 round clips. When one gets to that level, it presents the appearance of an obsession or paranoia.  (There are even some exceptions to this thought, too.  If you shoot competition, you need 20 round clips.)

I think that maybe we need to go back to when the Constitution was written, and think of what was available to folks at that time.  I propose that anybody be allowed to have all the muskets, flintlocks, and blunderbusses that their little hearts desire.  After all I seriously doubt that the framers of our constitution could begin to envision AK47s or automatic machine guns like we have today...AND I seriously doubt that they would have written the second amendment quite as obscurely as they did had they known..